Skip to main content

How to move flashback data archive to a different tablespace?

The documentation says to ALTER FLASHBACK ARCHIVE REMOVE TABLESPACE following:
If the tablespace to be removed contains any data within the retention period of the flashback archive, then that data will be dropped as well. Therefore, you should move your data to another tablespace before removing the tablespace with this clause.


However, the question is: how do you move the data?

Attempt to move the internal tables stored in flashback archive raises
ORA-55622: DML, ALTER and CREATE UNIQUE INDEX operations are not allowed on table "SCOTT"."SYS_FBA_DDL_COLMAP_69926"

And the response of Oracle support is simple:
What you are trying to do is not currently possible. You cannot move the FDA history tables from one tablespace to another, nor can you move the FDA to another tablespace using ALTER FLASHBACK ARCHIVE.

Development however acknowledges that this is a desired feature that they will look into adding for a future release.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Filter and access predicates

More than just column projections When we look around for further pointers in the tree nodes, we find more pieces resembling the column projections we have seen so far. With some experimenting, we will find out that these are access predicates and filters. First of all, the location of these pointers is not always the same, it seems that the value at 0x34 is some kind of flag, indicating whether filters and/or access predicates are present, and where. Or whether there is just one, or more of them.  It probably also indicates what other info is present, but I have no idea what info that would be or what each value means. Resembling, but different The data we see as predicates are not columns; after all, a predicate is a condition, not a single column. But the structure is similar to what we have seen with columns, and if we follow pointers further, we eventually build a tree, and some of the leaves are indeed just column projections. After some contemplation, we realize it's...
Post a Comment
Read more

dbms_alert on RAC

Not long time ago, I came across a usage of dbms_alert to manage running jobs. As the solution implemented must work also for RAC, I wanted to know whether dbms_alert works on RAC across instances. The documentation nor Metalink does not say anything (contrary to dbms_pipe, which does NOT work on RAC). So, if they don't warn, it should work... However, Julian Dyke says, that dbms_alert does not work and is the same as dbms_pipe (sources: http://juliandyke.com/Presentations/Presentations.html#ARoughGuideToRAC , page 17, or Pro Oracle Database 10g RAC on Linux, page 426). You know, never trust anybody, so I conducted a test case (10.2.0.3 on Linux x86_64, VMware ESX server, 2-node RAC): You will need two simultaneous sessions, I mark them with DWH1> and DWH2> here. DWH1> select instance_name from v$instance; INSTANCE_NAME ---------------- DWH1 DWH2> select instance_name from v$instance; INSTANCE_NAME ---------------- DWH2 DWH2> exec dbms_alert.register('TST'); ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Execution plan rows

The plan As mentioned in previous post, our example is based on the sample SH schema, with an added table FOOBAR (id number, key varchar2(30)): SELECT prod_id, key FROM products CROSS JOIN foobar WHERE prod_id in (143,144,id) and id in (1,2,3); In all reverse engineering, it's good to start with something simple and to know what we to look for. Thus we want to know what the execution plan should look like; and the more unique numbers/ids we can find, the better. It's much easier to look for a number like 0x12fa1893 than for 0x0 or 0x1. The execution plan, obtained using: SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY(null,null,'ALL'));  is I have added the CPU cost from the full detail of the execution plan in  v$sql_plan / x$kqlfxpl. Looking at the numbers, we also have rows (1 and 2 ... not very unique), bytes (34 / 30 / 8 - not bad) and what is not shown here, we also know object ids of the index and the table: 94765 and 92749 (nice). We did not use any...
Post a Comment
Read more