Skip to main content

Docker machine - wonderful idea, too many bugs?

When doing various experiments with docker, I painfully realized that btrfs keeps a lot to be desired.

Wonderful idea, terrible user experience. First of all, df lies, and you are supposed to run btrfs balance often. Maybe it's because of the way docker uses it - it creates a ton of large images.
Eventually you touch all chunks and rebalance stops working completely. Now you desperately delete things, hoping to get chunk free and let rebalance get thins back to order. Or not - and you end up nuking the server and reinstalling.
Or you perhaps end up crashing up the server and the btrfs won't mount anymore...

So after going through 5 servers (OL7.1 in VBox), I moved onto docker-machine. Wonderful idea - and it does not use btrfs, yay!

However, it also has it's bugs... and pretty ugly. First of all, the latest stable boot2docker 1.9 has a kernel bug that causes Java process to become zombies and docker container won't finish. See https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/18180 . In my case, it means that Oracle database software installation never finishes.

Ok, the link says it's fixed in the upcoming 1.10 image. And indeed it does - and it's very easy to switch to it, just add --virtualbox-boot2docker-url=https://github.com/boot2docker/boot2docker/releases/download/v1.10.0-rc2-b/boot2docker.iso or similar to docker-machine create. Oracle then installs fine.
However, another bug that emerges: nobody can ptrace a process. Which includes gdb - it cannot attach to a running process, becoming completely useless.

Attaching to process 24

ptrace: Operation not permitted.

Let's hope this is fixed soon...
(See my post at https://forums.docker.com/t/boot2docker-mac-os-x-10-0-failing-ptrace-gdb/6005 )

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid

I was asked to analyze a situation, when an attempt to recover a 11g (standby) database resulted in bunch of "ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid" errors.

I tried to reproduce the error on my test system, using different versions (EE, SE, 11.1.0.6, 11.1.0.7), but to no avail. Fortunately, I finally got to the failing system:

SQL> recover standby database;
ORA-00279: change 9614132 generated at 11/27/2009 17:59:06 needed for thread 1
ORA-00289: suggestion :
/u01/flash_recovery_area/T1/archivelog/2009_11_27/o1_mf_1_208_%u_.arc
ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
ORA-00280: change 9614132 for thread 1 is in sequence #208


Interestingly, nothing interesting is written to alert.log n…

Reading data from PGA and SGA

Overview For our investigation of execution plan as it is stored in memory, we need in the first place to be able to read the memory.

We have the options of
x$ksmmem, reading SGA using SQL. Personally I don't like it, it's cumbersome and slow.direct SGA read: obviously reading SGA only; it's fast and easy to doread process memory: can read PGA, process stack - and since the processes do map the SGA, too, you can read it as well. Unfortunately ptrace sends signals to the processes and the process is paused when reading it, but so far all my reads were short and fast and the processes did not notice. Some OS configurations can prevent you from using ptrace (e.g. docker by default), google for CAP_SYS_PTRACE.gdb: using your favorite debugger, you can read memory as well. Useful when investigating. Direct SGA read I always considered direct SGA read of some dark magic, but the fundamentals are actually very easy. It still looks like sorcery when actually reading the Oracle in…

Filter and access predicates

More than just column projections When we look around for further pointers in the tree nodes, we find more pieces resembling the column projections we have seen so far. With some experimenting, we will find out that these are access predicates and filters.

First of all, the location of these pointers is not always the same, it seems that the value at 0x34 is some kind of flag, indicating whether filters and/or access predicates are present, and where. Or whether there is just one, or more of them.  It probably also indicates what other info is present, but I have no idea what info that would be or what each value means.
Resembling, but different The data we see as predicates are not columns; after all, a predicate is a condition, not a single column. But the structure is similar to what we have seen with columns, and if we follow pointers further, we eventually build a tree, and some of the leaves are indeed just column projections.
After some contemplation, we realize it's all t…